Governor Takes Bill Action

SPRINGFIELD - Governor Bruce Rauner took action today on the following bills:

Bill No.: HB 1380
An Act Concerning Government
Action: Amendatory Vetoed
Note: Amendatory Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 3262
An Act Concerning Finance
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 4257
An Act Concerning State Government
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: HB 4259
An Act Concerning Public Employee Benefits
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: HB 4326
An Act Concerning Criminal Law
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 4365
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: HB 5017
An Act Concerning Courts
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: HB 5025
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 5539
An Act Concerning State Government
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 5610
An Act Concerning Local Government
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: HB 5918
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: HB 6027
An Act Concerning Public Aid
Action: Amendatory Vetoed
Note: Amendatory Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 6162
An Act Concerning Employment
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: HB 6299
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: HB 6302
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: HB 6333
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 140
An Act Concerning Business
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 242
An Act Concerning Education
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: SB 462
An Act Concerning Regulation
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2261
An Act Concerning Transportation
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2359
An Act Concerning Civil Law
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: SB 2427
An Act Concerning Revenue
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2450
An Act Concerning Civil Law
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2465
An Act Concerning Criminal Law
Action: Amendatory Vetoed
Note: Amendatory Veto Message Below

Bill No.: SB 2532
An Act Concerning State Government
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2585
An Act Concerning State Government
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2746
An Act Concerning Revenue
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2819
An Act Concerning Public Employee Benefits
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: SB 2864
An Act Concerning State Government
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 2929
An Act Concerning Public Aid
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: SB 2982
An Act Concerning Regulation
Action: Vetoed
Note: Veto Message Below

Bill No.: SB 3047
An Act Concerning Revenue
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 3162
An Act Concerning Courts
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Bill No.: SB 3163
An Act Concerning Employment
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: SB 3164
An Act Concerning Criminal Law
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: SB 3335
An Act Concerning Regulation
Action: Signed
Effective: January 1, 2017

Bill No.: SB 3336
An Act Concerning Regulation
Action: Signed
Effective: Immediate

Amendatory Veto Message for HB 1380

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois House of Representatives,
99th General Assembly:

Today I return House Bill 1380 with specific recommendations for change.

House Bill 1380 was intended to prevent parties to an arbitration award from delaying enforcement through bad faith litigation tactics that are intended to delay the hearing or exhaust the financial resources of the opposing side. The legislation sought to prevent these bad faith tactics by adopting a universal, state-wide "loser pays" system, in which the losing party in any effort to challenge or stay the enforcement of an arbitration award must pay the fees and cost of the winning side. This sweeping solution goes too far and, as drafted, would have the unintended consequence of preventing equal access to justice and the legal system. A more nuanced and hybrid approach will achieve the same purpose without preventing parties from seeking judicial review of hard, or close, cases.

American legal tradition discourages the "loser pays" concept in most forms of litigation. The "American Rule," as it is known, provides that each party to litigation should pay for their own costs. However, to deter bad faith by the parties in litigation, many states including the Federal Courts have adopted narrow discretionary fee shifting rules. Under these fee shifting rules, if the prevailing party can show that the other side was acting in bad faith or pursuing frivolous claims in order the merely delay the outcome or exhaust the resources of their opponent, then a judge may exercise his or her discretion and order the losing party to pay the reasonable costs and attorney's fees of the prevailing party. These fee shifting rules allow judges to decide when fee shifting is appropriate - not in every case, but when there is a showing of bad faith.

As written, House Bill 1380 goes a giant step farther than simply empowering judges to order reasonable costs and fees upon a showing of bad faith. House Bill 1380 makes the loser automatically and always responsible for the prevailing party's fees and costs, even if they acted in good faith, or even if it was a close case upon which reasonable minds could differ as to the appropriate outcome. This automatic fee shifting - acting as an appeal penalty - will make it far more difficult for parties to seek redress in the courts, especially for those levels of government that already cannot meet all costs of their obligations. Rather than achieving fairness, this bill will have the practical and unintended effect of limiting access to justice for everyone except the most well financed litigants. It will have a chilling effect on all parties, regardless of whether they are a local government, labor union, or the State of Illinois itself.

Minor changes can prevent the unintended consequence and still achieve the goals of bill. Simply by changing "shall" to "may" and providing judges with a familiar standard of review will ensure that bad faith tactics are penalized but those parties acting in good faith can still have their day in court.

My recommendations for changed are modeled after the fee shifting rule applicable in Federal court. Parties will still have access to the courts, and the prevailing party will have the ability to recover reasonable costs and attorney's fees by showing that the losing side acted in bad faith by unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying the proceedings in order to delay compliance or enforcement of the arbitration award. The "unreasonably and vexatiously" standard already exists in law, so it will be familiar to applying courts and parties alike.

These simple changes will allow judges use their independent judgment to ensure the proper dispensation of justice based on the totality of the circumstances, accomplish the purpose of the original bill, but not obstruct parties' access to justice when they have good faith claims for relief.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(e) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 1380, entitled "AN ACT concerning government", with the following specific recommendations for change:

On page 2, line 2, by replacing "shall" with "may be ordered by a reviewing court to"; and
On page 2, by replacing lines 9 and 10 with "non-compliant party if the prevailing party can demonstrate that the opposing party proceeded in bad faith by unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying the proceedings in order to delay compliance or enforcement of the arbitration award. Any mutual agreements otherwise shall be a permissive subject of bargaining."; and
On page 12, line 20, by replacing "shall" with "may be ordered by a reviewing court to"; and
On page 13, by replacing line 24 with "to that party if the prevailing party can demonstrate that the opposing party proceeded in bad faith by unreasonably and vexatiously multiplying the proceedings in order to delay compliance or enforcement of the arbitration award. Any mutually agreed procedures providing for".

With these changes, House Bill 1380 will have my approval. I respectfully request your concurrence.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for HB 3262

To the Honorable Members of The Illinois House of Representatives, 99th General Assembly:

Today I return House Bill 3262.

House Bill 3262 would allow the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority to issue $293 million in bonds to replace its loan that funded construction of its second hotel adjacent to McCormick Place. The new bonds would be payable from local Authority taxes, freeing up the hotel revenue to be spent by the Authority on any of its operations rather than dedicating the hotel revenue to loan repayment.

Under current law, the State is required to cover any deficiency in Authority tax revenues needed to repay any of its tax-backed bonds, up to specified levels. House Bill 3262 would expand this State obligation within these levels by the debt service of the newly authorized bonds and extends the State's bond commitment by six years, until 2066. This bill would increase the amount of bonds to be repaid with existing Authority taxes and thus increase the risk to the State of having to cover any shortfalls needed for the higher bond debt over the next 50 years. The State is not in a financial position to accept this additional risk.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 3262 entitled "AN ACT concerning finance", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for HB 4326

To the Honorable Members of The Illinois House of Representatives, 99th General Assembly:

Today I veto House Bill 4326, which would require the Department of Corrections to reopen the Hardin County Work Camp, but provide no resources to fund repairs or operations.

Hardin County Work Camp closed in January 2016 as a result of high maintenance and repair costs from a fire at the Camp. Due to the burdens of the State's procurement process, the Department was initially unable to undertake such repairs and the costs continued to rise. The Department followed proper facility closure procedures and all the persons housed at the Camp were relocated to other similar facilities. Employees were offered other employment opportunities at nearby facilities.

While I appreciate the impact of this facility closure on the local economy, forcing the Department of Corrections to reopen the Camp is an unnecessary spend of taxpayer dollars. The funds required to complete the repairs are not within the Department's budget nor were they appropriated in any budget proposed by the General Assembly. As such, this legislation would require the Department to reallocate resources from other vital services in order to comply.

I am committed to reducing our prison population and believe that work camp facilities play an important role in rehabilitating offenders. However, requiring the opening of a dilapidated facility hamstrings the Department's discretion in using its limited resources.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 4326, entitled "AN ACT concerning criminal law", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for HB 5025

To the Honorable Members of The Illinois House of Representatives, 99th General Assembly:

Today I return House Bill 5025. The bill would amend the School Code to classify chief administrative officers and assistant administrative officers from educational service centers as regional and assistant regional superintendents. Their salaries would then be funded by the State like regional superintendents of education.

We need to look more broadly at our education bureaucracy and funding system. Illinois is dead last in State support for schools, our property taxes are the highest in the nation, we impose countless unfunded mandates on our schools that divert money from our students and teachers, and we have too many layers of administrative bureaucracy.

We convened the bipartisan School Funding Reform Commission earlier this year to make specific recommendations to reform our funding system. We must also examine our bureaucratic structures and whether we can reduce administrative costs in order to put more money where it belongs: in the classroom. Until then, we should refrain from making these types of changes to our funding system and school bureaucracy.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 5025 entitled "AN ACT education", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for HB 5539

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois House of Representatives,
99th General Assembly:

Today I return House Bill 5539.

The bill would prohibit the Department of Healthcare and Family Services from recovering overpayments or other amounts due from Medicaid providers after six years, unless there is an active law enforcement investigation or the recovery is required by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

We understand the challenges of doing business with the State of Illinois, which were compounded by years of mismanagement. The Department should be expected to identify potential overpayments promptly - not wait six or more years. We must continue to improve fiscal practices across State agencies to avoid this type of problem.

But when the Department becomes aware of overpayments, it should be able to take appropriate action to recover those amounts. Although the intent of this bill is laudable, ultimately Illinois taxpayers would be forced to bear the cost, while businesses and providers profit at their expense.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 5539, entitled "AN ACT concerning State government", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Amendatory Veto Message for HB 6027

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois House of Representatives,
99th General Assembly:

Today I return House Bill 6027, which establishes the Healthy Local Food Incentives Program administered by the Illinois Department of Human Services.

The purpose of the program is to increase access to fresh fruits and vegetables for Illinois residents that receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. The bill authorizes, subject to appropriation, the Department of Human Services to make an annual grant of$1,000,000 to a qualified non-profit organization, which would then distribute the funds to participating farmers market. The funds would be used to match benefit amounts spent on fruits and vegetables at participating farmers markets.

I thank the sponsors for their work to expand access to fresh produce and encourage healthy eating. I am concerned, however, that the bill allows up to 40% of the funds to be used for administrative funds. All of the funds should be directed to help SNAP beneficiaries. I also believe that this program should be limited to a $500,000 grant and a pilot program while we study its effectiveness and ensure that the funds are used to achieve the desired outcomes.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(e) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 6027, entitled "AN ACT concerning public aid", with the following specific recommendations for change:

On page 3, line 3, by replacing "$1,000,000" with "$500,000"; and
On page 3, by replacing line 25 with the following: "(f) One-hundred percent of the moneys deposited into the Fund"; and
On page 4, by replacing lines 1 through 6 with the following: "for healthy local food incentives."; and
On page 5, immediately after line 3, by inserting the following: "(i) This section is repealed on June 30, 2018."

With these changes, House Bill 6027 will have my approval. I respectfully request your concurrence.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for HB 6299

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois House of Representatives,
99th General Assembly:

Today I return House Bill 6299.

House Bill 6299 would impose another mandate on school districts in how they manage their personnel. The bill would require a school district to restore the rights of an employee who is rehired within a year after being laid-off.

I appreciate the important role that educational support personnel have in our schools. Those employees and their school district employers may negotiate for job protections, like the protections that would be mandated by this bill. But those decisions should be made at the local level, not mandated by statute. Our taxpayers are already suffering from the cost of unfunded Springfield mandates.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return House Bill 6299 entitled "AN ACT concerning education", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Amendatory Veto Message for SB 2465

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois Senate,
99th General Assembly:

We should be proud of the steps we have taken together to reform our criminal justice system. These efforts will reduce incarceration and recidivism rates, help incarcerated individuals to reenter the community and obtain gainful employment, and reduce costs to taxpayers. I thank the members of the General Assembly for being partners in this work.

Current law permits the Attorney General to bring legal action against formerly incarcerated individuals to recover incarceration-related expenses on behalf of the Department of Corrections. Senate Bill 2465 would stop this practice altogether. Today I return the bill with specific recommendations for change.

Proponents believe that collection efforts hinder an individual's successful reentry into the community. Many ex-offenders have few if any assets and struggle to find jobs to care for themselves or their families.

In practice, though, the State's power to recover costs is rarely used: the State collected approximately $355,000 total in Fiscal Year 2015. While I agree that this power should be used sparingly and judiciously, there are circumstances when it is warranted. Violent offenders with significant assets should compensate their victims and the State. For example, the State used this power to stop serial killer John Wayne Gacy from profiting while in prison.

The changes recommended below would protect low-income persons, while still enabling the State to pursue wealthier or violent offenders. The Department would establish a standard for determining whether a person has sufficient means, whether recovery by the State would inhibit the person's reintegration into the community, and whether the nature of the crime (such as a violent crime) warrants recovery efforts. The Department's proposed rules would be subject to public comment and review by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. The State would then be prohibited from pursuing recovery from persons except as allowed by that rule. This strikes the proper balance between protecting taxpayers and facilitating successful post-incarceration reentry.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(e) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return Senate Bill 2465, entitled "AN ACT concerning criminal law", with the following specific recommendations for change:

On page 1, by replacing line 5 with the following, "changing Section 3-7-6 as follows:"; and
On page 1, by replacing lines 6 through 23 with the following:
"(730 ILCS 5/3-7-6)
Sec. 3-7-6. Reimbursement for expenses.
(a) Responsibility of committed persons. For the purposes of this Section, "committed persons" mean those persons who through judicial determination have been placed in the custody of the Department on the basis of a conviction as an adult. Committed persons shall be responsible to reimburse the Department for the expenses incurred by their incarceration at a rate to be determined by the Department in accordance with this Section.
(1) Committed persons shall fully cooperate with the Department by providing complete financial information for the purposes under this Section.
(2) The failure of a committed person to fully cooperate as provided for in clauses (3) and (4) of subsection (a-5) shall be considered for purposes of a parole determination. Any committed person who willfully refuses to cooperate with the obligations set forth in this Section may be subject to the loss of sentence credit towards his or her sentence of up to 180 days.
(a-3) The Department shall establish by rule a standard for determining when to seek recovery of incarceration costs. The purpose of the standard is to protect persons convicted of non-violent offenses without substantial assets or income from recovery efforts that could inhibit their successful reintegration into the community, while enabling the Department to seek recovery from persons who were convicted of violent offenses or who have sufficient assets or income that could be applied to pay for the costs of their incarceration. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, neither the Attorney General nor the Department shall seek to recover incarceration costs except as permitted by the standard established by rule.
(a-5) Assets information form.
(1) The Department shall develop a form, which shall be used by the Department to obtain information from all committed persons regarding assets of the persons.
(2) In order to enable the Department to determine the financial status of the committed person, the form shall provide for obtaining the age and marital status of a committed person, the number and ages of children of the person, the number and ages of other dependents, the type and value of real estate, the type and value of personal property, cash and bank accounts, the location of any lock boxes, the type and value of investments, pensions and annuities and any other personalty of significant cash value, including but not limited to jewelry, art work and collectables, and all medical or dental insurance policies covering the committed person. The form may also provide for other information deemed pertinent by the Department in the investigation of a committed person's assets.
(3) Upon being developed, the form shall be submitted to each committed person as of the date the form is developed and to every committed person who thereafter is sentenced to imprisonment under the jurisdiction of the Department. The form may be resubmitted to a committed person by the Department for purpose of obtaining current information regarding the assets of the person.
(4) Every committed person shall complete the form or provide for completion of the form and the committed person shall swear under oath or affirm that to the best of his or her knowledge the information provided is complete and accurate.
(b) Expenses. The rate at which sums to be charged for the expenses incurred by a committed person for his or her confinement shall be computed by the Department as the average per capita cost per day for all inmates of that institution or facility for that fiscal year. The average per capita cost per day shall be computed by the Department based on the average per capita cost per day for the operation of that institution or facility for the fiscal year immediately preceding the period of incarceration for which the rate is being calculated. The Department shall establish rules and regulations providing for the computation of the above costs, and shall determine the average per capita cost per day for each of its institutions or facilities for each fiscal year. The Department shall have the power to modify its rules and regulations, so as to provide for the most accurate and most current average per capita cost per day computation. Where the committed person is placed in a facility outside the Department, the Department may pay the actual cost of services in that facility, and may collect reimbursement for the entire amount paid from the committed person receiving those services.
(c) Records. The records of the Department, including, but not limited to, those relating to: the average per capita cost per day for a particular institution or facility for a particular year, and the calculation of the average per capita cost per day; the average daily population of a particular Department correctional institution or facility for a particular year; the specific placement of a particular committed person in various Department correctional institutions or facilities for various periods of time; and the record of transactions of a particular committed person's trust account under Section 3-4-3 of this Act; may be proved in any legal proceeding, by a reproduced copy thereof or by a computer printout of Department records, under the certificate of the Director. If reproduced copies are used, the Director must certify that those are true and exact copies of the records on file with the Department. If computer printouts of records of the Department are offered as proof, the Director must certify that those computer printouts are true and exact representations of records properly entered into standard electronic computing equipment, in the regular course of the Department's business, at or reasonably near the time of the occurrence of the facts recorded, from trustworthy and reliable information. The reproduced copy or computer printout shall, without further proof, be admitted into evidence in any legal proceeding, and shall be prima facie correct and prima facie evidence of the accuracy of the information contained therein.
(d) Authority. Except as provided in subsection (a-3), the The Director, or the Director's designee, may, when he or she knows or reasonably believes that a committed person, or the estate of that person, has assets which may be used to satisfy all or part of a judgment rendered under this Act, or when he or she knows or reasonably believes that a committed person is engaged in gang-related activity and has a substantial sum of money or other assets, provide for the forwarding to the Attorney General of a report on the committed person and that report shall contain a completed form under subsection (a-5) together with all other information available concerning the assets of the committed person and an estimate of the total expenses for that committed person, and authorize the Attorney General to institute proceedings to require the persons, or the estates of the persons, to reimburse the Department for the expenses incurred by their incarceration. The Attorney General, upon authorization of the Director, or the Director's designee, shall institute actions on behalf of the Department and pursue claims on the Department's behalf in probate and bankruptcy proceedings, to recover from committed persons the expenses incurred by their confinement. For purposes of this subsection (d), "gang-related" activity has the meaning ascribed to it in Section 10 of the Illinois Streetgang Terrorism Omnibus Prevention Act.
(e) Scope and limitations.
(1) No action under this Section shall be initiated more than 2 years after the release or death of the committed person in question.
(2) The death of a convicted person, by execution or otherwise, while committed to a Department correctional institution or facility shall not act as a bar to any action or proceeding under this Section.
(3) The assets of a committed person, for the purposes of this Section, shall include any property, tangible or intangible, real or personal, belonging to or due to a committed or formerly committed person including income or payments to the person from social security, worker's compensation, veteran's compensation, pension benefits, or from any other source whatsoever and any and all assets and property of whatever character held in the name of the person, held for the benefit of the person, or payable or otherwise deliverable to the person. Any trust, or portion of a trust, of which a convicted person is a beneficiary, shall be construed as an asset of the person, to the extent that benefits thereunder are required to be paid to the person, or shall in fact be paid to the person. At the time of a legal proceeding by the Attorney General under this Section, if it appears that the committed person has any assets which ought to be subjected to the claim of the Department under this Section, the court may issue an order requiring any person, corporation, or other legal entity possessed or having custody of those assets to appropriate any of the assets or a portion thereof toward reimbursing the Department as provided for under this Section. No provision of this Section shall be construed in violation of any State or federal limitation on the collection of money judgments.
(4) Nothing in this Section shall preclude the Department from applying federal benefits that are specifically provided for the care and treatment of a committed person toward the cost of care provided by a State facility or private agency."; and
By deleting pages 2 through 18.

With these changes, Senate Bill 2465 will have my approval. I respectfully request your concurrence.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for SB 2819

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois Senate,
99th General Assembly:

Today I veto Senate Bill 2819, which amends the Illinois Pension Code.

Currently, Cook County may contribute to the Cook County Pension Fund only from property tax levy proceeds. Senate Bill 2819 would permit Cook County to use funds from additional sources to cover the Fund's administrative and annuity expenses. While I would ordinarily applaud legislation aimed at providing any unit of local government with more freedom to manage its fiscal affairs, this bill both unnecessarily restricts how Cook County spends additional resources and fails to address the single biggest problem facing the Cook County Pension Fund, which is its underfunding.

Nonetheless, I encourage the County and the Fund to continue working on an agreed language that would allow the County to responsibly prioritize any additional taxpayer dollars.

Therefore, pursuant to Article IV, Section 9(b) of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return Senate Bill 2819, entitled "AN ACT concerning public employee benefits", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR

Veto Message for SB 2982

To the Honorable Members of
The Illinois Senate,
99th General Assembly:

Today I return Senate Bill 2982. The bill would curtail an existing right of business owners to do roofing work on their own property.

Professional licenses are sometimes needed to protect public safety. But Illinois's licensing scheme is outdated, often nonsensical, and out of step with practices in other states. We must broadly examine the circumstances in which a license should be required and the costs and requirements for obtaining a license in order to promote economic growth and reduce professional barriers.

I encourage the General Assembly to work with the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation on comprehensive licensing reform. Until then, changing the scope of work for which a license is needed piecemeal - as this bill does - is premature.

Therefore, pursuant to Section 9(b) of Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, I hereby return Senate Bill 2982 entitled "AN ACT concerning regulation", with the foregoing objections, vetoed in its entirety.

Sincerely,
Bruce Rauner
GOVERNOR